After much procrastination, I’m finally going to explain why I will be voting for Senator Barack Obama in the New York Democratic Primary next month.
My support for Senator Barack goes far beyond identity politics. Unfortunately, my vote is not so much in support of him as it is a vote against his competition. Part of my support for him comes from his unofficial endorsement by Governor Bill Richardson (for whom I originally supported) who recently dropped out of the Presidential race. Many have speculated that because Richardson is Latino, and Latinos are the de facto junior partners in the Civil Rights Movement, that Richardson would automatically throw his support to the half-black Barack Obama. Already some of Richardson’s former supporters such as California state Senator Gil Cedillo and former state Democratic Senator Martha Escutia of Los Angeles have officially endorsed Obama now that the New Mexico Governor has dropped out of the race. Some people have even speculated that Obama may select Richardson to be his running mate.
One reason I am supporting Obama is because of his leniency towards federal drug laws. The federal drug laws and the Drug Enforcement Agency represent the most atrocious rape of the Constitution, which does not even mention drugs. The War on Drugs is really a war on black and brown people in America, and no one can really say they believe in racial equality if they support the War on Drugs.
Among all of the candidates, Obama is the only one who is committed to reforming this nation’s drug laws. On his campaign web site, Obama has appropriately placed his platform on drug laws under his commitment to civil rights, such as eliminating the harsher sentences for crack-related offenses (a drug predominantly used by black people) than the comparably softer sentences for that of cocaine (the drug of choice for white people).
Obama also wants non-violent first-time drug offenders (with the exception of dealers and traffickers) to serve their sentence in a drug rehabilitation center where they can actually get the drug out of their system as opposed to sharing a cell with cold-blooded murderers and rapists in the overcrowded federal prison system, where rape, gang activity and drug abuse runs rampant. This is an important step in prison reform because drug addiction should be treated for what it really is: a health issue, not a crime.
Because people of color make up the vast majority of incarcerated drug offenders (Blacks and Latinos make up 92 percent of drug offenders in New York State prisons), it would make sense that a President of color would want to reverse this 21st Century form of institutionalized racism.
I do feel Obama’s willingness to admit he personally experimented with marijuana and cocaine as a youth (the only candidate to admit this) shows he has an understanding and a sympathy towards those who use illegal narcotics. I don’t see the other front runners in either party addressing this issue, including John Edwards, the so-called “poverty candidate”.
Obama’s international upbringing is another reason I think he should be the next President. While Bill Clinton was certainly the most cosmopolitan and worldly President this country has had in 100 years, we truly need someone who can embrace a foreign policy that examines things through a truly international perspective rather than the nationalistic and myopic view of most Americans, especially our current commander-in-chief. America needs to recognize it is not its own planet, but a part of a world of many different nations, cultures and most importantly, perspectives. While I don’t necessarily think Obama’s competitors are a bunch of narrow-minded bigots, I do believe that they would make a wholehearted yet unsuccessful attempt at understanding the rest of the world, a task which Obama would find rather easy to accomplish.
I think another great reason for Barack Obama to be elected President of the United States is so that white Americans can stop referring to the U.S. as a white country. I am so sick of white people soiling themselves because of the latest Census figures showing an increase in Latin American immigration and a larger African-American presence in previously all-white suburbs and rural areas. Get over it, white people. This is not Europe; if you want to live in a Caucasian country, you’re on the wrong side of the Atlantic. Racially and ethnically speaking, the New World is neutral territory and should not be thought of as being home to a “white country” or the homeland of any race, with exception of Native Americans.
And speaking of race, I believe a mulatto (yeah, I said it!) President would trivialize racial tensions in America, particular the love-hate relationship between blacks and whites. Symbols are powerful, and the appearance of a biracial U.S. President would do more to sweep away racial tensions than any well-meaning Caucasian candidate. Sorry, Bill Clinton. Barack Obama is going to be the real first black President.