After 11 years of attending college (I dropped out three times and spent a few semesters part-time) I finally earned my Baccalaureate degree last December. All I really have to show for it is a shelf full of books I was unable to sell back to the college bookstore that I’ll never read, a dozen or so notebooks whose few remaining unused pages serve as a memo pad and a shitload of debt.

I’ve always considered myself to be a fairly practical person, but choosing to attend college forced me to make some fairly impractical decisions. For example, attending classes full-time made it absolutely impossible to work full-time; my grades suffered the few times I did attempt to do so. As a result, I could only search for part-time employment and passed up several promising full-time positions.

Furthermore, throughout the time I spent in college I found it harder and harder to find gainful employment (not a coincidence considering the failed economic policies of the Bush Administration over the last eight years) and cut my living expenses down to less than $400 a month, using credit cards as unemployment insurance while I looked for work.

Fast-food chains told me I was overqualified to work there and that management positions were for those with previous fast food experience; some never got back to me at all. Retail work was my only salvation during my stints of unemployment. As the years rolled on and some of my credit accounts went into collection my credit rating took a turn for the worse. At the same time I took out a student loan for about $5,500 to live on, a comparatively small sum compared to that of other college students.

The only thing that convinced me to return to college was my passion for journalism. Without an undergrad degree, small neighborhood newspapers with shoestring budgets were the only publications willing to hire me, and even at that level I had to compete with recent college graduates for work. But now, the industry that for the last 20 years has forced itself to do more with less has tightened its budget even further, with many newspapers across the country selling out to a handful of large media conglomerates. An industry that even in a city as ethnically diverse as New York only hires minorities to satisfy the bare minimum Affirmative Action requirements.

Was I a fool to struggle through college and sacrifice my credit rating and earning ability for several years just to be able to look for work in an industry that doesn’t want someone who looks like me, or would give me a hard time to get into even if I was white?

In some respects, I do feel going to college greatly damaged me financially and probably did more harm than good to my journalism career.

Just out of curiosity, I decided to Google “college graduate debt” and found some interesting results:

“A new study suggests that rising tuitions, higher borrowing limits on government loans and a new wave of low-income students have pushed the average debt burden of college graduates higher as more students from all income groups borrow more — in some cases a lot more — to finance their undergraduate educations.” -USA Today

“More Americans are attending and leaving college in debt, according to reports released by the Democratic Policy Committee, the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges (NCBJ) and the Project On Student Debt, who also say in 2004, two-thirds of four-year college graduates had student loan debt, up from less than one-third in 1993.

“Reportedly, compared to a decade ago, more people are borrowing large amounts to pay for college than they ever have before, even after accounting for inflation. In 1993, 1.3 percent of graduating seniors with student loans owed at least $40,000 (in 2004 dollars). In 2004, 7.7 percent owed $40,000 or more.”-CNet

“For many recent college graduates, job prospects have thinned and landing that entry level job is a chore. The sour economy is challenging optimistic, young members of the workforce who face unemployment rates nearly three times that of the general population. Graduates are also pressured to find employment to pay off record amounts of student loan debt.” -Minnesota Public Radio

“Among Those Graduating College with Debt: - 34% say they have sold possessions to make ends meet - 42% say they live ‘paycheck-to-paycheck’ - 27% say they delayed getting a medical or dental procedure - 31% with Outstanding College Loans Say Madonna Will Become a Grandmother Before Their Debt is Paid Off - One-Third of Indebted Graduates Give Parents ‘D’ or ‘F’ for Financial Preparations 9-in-10 Say Graduating Without Debt is a ‘Big Advantage in Life’ -PRNewswire

And this serious problem is not limited to the U.S. Take a look at China, whose universities do not grant degrees to students until they have finished paying off their debt:

“Last month, Li felt that he struck good fortune when he was finally offered a job by the Guangdong-based Midea Holding Co Ltd upon graduation. “For me, obtaining the job will ensure getting rid of poverty and repaying the university debt and the student loan,” said Li.

“However, the excitement did not last long since he could not obtain the essential certificates necessary to complete an employment contract, including graduation and degree certificates and assignment documents due to his failure to pay off his debts to the university.

“Born in a poor family in a small village of Liuyang, Hunan Province, Li and his family had no enough money to pay his tuition and accommodation fees for his four years of study at university. But Li said he was counting on getting a student loan from the bank when he registered four years ago, with 6,000 yuan (US$722), almost all the money his family could borrow. Since the certificates are a must for the employer to recognize his academic credentials from the university, Li felt the dream of employment would just flicker and die out.”-PRC Consulate of New York

Given the current situation that a college education no longer provides the financial security and job stability it once did, and that millions of students are graduating with unmanageably large amounts of debt, I wondered if more people weren’t asking themselves if going to college was worth it if you have to borrow money to do so. I Googled “is it worth it to go to college?

There are millions of people like myself who grew up in low-income families, graduated from inner-city high schools and were sold the lie by parents, teachers and self-appointed “community leaders” that a college education is a surefire way to pull yourself out of poverty.

But if you graduate with so much outstanding debt that you may end up having less discretionary income than your peers who may have foregone college and entered the work force right after high school or had entered a trade school as opposed to traditional academia, was it really worth going to college? After all, the poorer your family is, the more you have to borrow. And when you can’t turn to family to help pay off your debt, you may end up putting off such things as getting married, starting a family, moving out of your parents’ home or even saving for your children’s’ college educations.

Poor people, and especially minorities, are constantly told as adolescents that education on its own is the key to success, no matter what the cost because the end justifies the means. But we soon find out that something as simple as not having a car or a certain license/certificate can keep you out of many jobs, regardless of academic credentials.

The truth is, what particular occupation or profession your major prepares you for and what internships you take on in that occupation or related field is what really determines how soon you will find steady work after graduation. Everything outside of your major (your general education requirements) is a great supplemental education, but does not help you become better at whatever it is you’re majoring in. If it did, it would be a required course in your major.

I was glad to see I wasn’t the only one asking that question. I found an excellent article by Scott Sellers who called today’s system of higher education “the opiate of the masses” (anyone who had to learn about Karl Marx will appreciate such a reference). Sellers, who possesses an Associates degree, offered the following:

“…the most sinister aspect of this illusion of self-improvement is the misconception that we as individuals cannot educate ourselves. How sad is it that we are awash in information, yet we feel that unless an “official” institution is spoon-feeding us a proper diet of knowledge, we will be left uneducated?

“The education being offered in our colleges and universities, when viewed in this light, truly begins to look like a symbol not of initiative or intelligence, but one of affluence and mediocrity.”

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

An article by Scott Burns addresses the same question through a less philosophical approach like Sellers and takes a more fiscal view of the outcome of a student who borrows money to attend college versus someone who does not go to college at all.

“When you earn more money, you pay more taxes, and you pay at higher rates. One consequence is that the cost of repaying college loans rises because you have to pay more taxes to net enough cash to repay a dollar of original borrowing.

“Forgoing four years of earning power while in college on borrowed money nearly evens the playing field.”

I guess that pretty much delivers a well-deserved bitch slap to that overused, outdated statistic from the 1980 U.S. Census that states that college graduates earn $1 million more over a lifetime than high school graduates. While there may be some truth in that statement, those who recite it forget to factor in the money borrowed to obtain a college degree as well as the years spent outside of the work force (those years when most Americans are at their most productive).

Do any members of the graduating classes of 2007 or 2008 feel their college experience was worth having?

I’d love to hear from someone on this.

4 Responses to “I Majored in Debt”

  1. HispanicPundit says:

    Your post reminds me of this upcoming book. Hopefully the author will eventually finish it.

    Sorry to hear about your difficult time. Hopefully the economy turns around soon and you can follow your dreams of becoming a journalist. I know you will be a great one.

  2. Nicky Cheese says:

    Rough stuff. Better frame that bitch…and by bitch I mean degree.

  3. Not The Only One says:

    Hey HP,

    That Bryan Caplan book sounds fascinating, especially coming from a tenured professor.

    While my personal evidence is anecdotal, it’s at least somewhat comforting to know that there are statistics out there revealing that millions of Americans are in the same situation as myself…and even worse. According to what I’ve read, it appears that the problems recent college graduates are experiencing in the job market are partially due to an over saturation of workers with college degrees. Some of the jobs requiring a college education have been outsourced to other countries.

    Personally, I think the problem is there weren’t that many of them to begin with. I think most jobs require things like certification, licenses, occupation-specific training, previous job or industry experience and of course, personal connections rather than a four-year degree. This is not to speak ill of occupations that do rely heavily on academic credentials, I’m just saying that such jobs are in the minority and were probably never that plentiful to begin with.

    Then you have industries like the media, which traditionally only required a high school diploma. I think some industries just require a college education so they can shrink the pool of prospective employees. As any LA resident such as yourself knows, media is one of those few industries where many people are dying to get into, especially if you want to be in front of the camera or have your byline in the newspaper and especially if you wish to work in a large media market.

    I do believe that college does work many people. But it doesn’t work for everybody, and the big problem is that everybody is either heavily encouraged to pursue a college education or have been shoved into a one-size-fits-all curriculum in grade school that focuses on preparing them for college, not real life. When I first entered high school in 1993, when the NYC Board of Education was a testament to corruption and inefficiency, the wood shop, metal shop and auto shop had been discontinued at my school.

    Students who wanted to enter a vocational program had to transfer to another high school. While this sounds like no big deal, there were only two high schools at the time for a county with a population of 2 million, and the seats for these vocational programs often filled quickly with some students having to be on a waiting list while floundering in a rigorous academic setting that basically prepped you for college as your only option after high school.

    The other problem with the vocational option was that the two high schools in my county (Queens) were schools with high rates of gang violence. Both high schools in which these vocational programs were located had metal detectors and my school did not, and the only time these schools were mentioned in the papers was when someone had been attacked or if a gang war had erupted there (Remember, this was the 90s, when there more gangs in New York and the Bloods, Crips and MS were not as prominent in NYC as they are today).

    So if you didn’t want to get robbed or slashed, your only option would be to apply to a high school vocational program in another county like the Bronx (which makes Queens appear tame in comparison), Manhattan or Brooklyn. So if you didn’t want a let’s-get-ready-for-college curriculum, you had to travel pretty far or venture into unfriendly neighborhoods. Trust me, Giuliani may have been cleaning up the streets in the 90s, but he wasn’t doing a damn thing to clean up the schools.

    Fortunately, with Mike Bloomberg as Mayor, the Board of Ed was dismantled and a new Department of Education has taken its place and non-academic vocational programs have expanded over the years, giving kids more options for their future. But I digress.

    As for my dreams of becoming a full-time journalist, I’m not too sure about following that pipe dream. I was a part-time journalist for several years in small newspapers, and even at that level the competition is pretty fierce. So maybe that chapter of my life is behind me, and that I should expand my career possibilities as a professional writer to fields beyond journalism. I have lots of good memories of stories I’d covered, people I worked with, people I interviewed. I was a great journalist, and still am.

    The U.S. news industry is shrinking, and on the major TV newscasts, entertainment is often passed off as current events which I think is a big part of the reason why viewership and readership are ironically shrinking in the Information Age. Traditionally, news networks were never expected to make money. In fact, media corporations usually expected their news divisions to lose money (they would make up for that threefold in their entertainment divisions) because they were treated as they should be, as a private sector public service as opposed to just another capitalistic venture.

    I’ve found that today’s publishers have little to no background in journalism and the bulk of their professional experience is in making profits in other industries as executives or entrepreneurs. So they treat it like any other business and do what they can to make the news not only profitable but lucrative as well. In doing so, reporters are forced to do more with less resources and to dumb down much of the content to ensure that the content can be consumed by as many people as possible. I’ve spent way to much of my past as a reporter covering superficial bullshit that indirectly affects a handful of people while stories that affect millions don’t receive the coverage they deserve.

    Speaking of dumbing down, I once worked at one newspaper whose editorial policy demanded that each page have at least three photos, reasoning that readers “sometimes get turned off by too many words.” I remember the first time one of my stories was significantly shaved down to accommodate a photo that was abstractly related to the story. When the editor-in-chief explained the editorial policy I yelled, “What is this, a newspaper or a fucking coloring book?”

    Geez…come to think of it, maybe I should stay out the news biz (it seems to get worse as time passes) and leave it to the professionals. And by professionals I mean smoking hot sexy lady anchors that are so drop-dead gorgeous it makes you wonder if journalism experience was an issue at all to get their job. I just wasn’t born to be an on-air news personality…right ethnicity, wrong gender.

  4. Not The Only One says:

    Hey Nicky,

    I guess the biggest joke about this whole college thing (next to being out of work for an extended period of time) is that I don’t even have a degree to frame. At the City University of New York, from where I graduated, the average time I have to wait for them to actually print out my degree is 18 months, so I should start shopping for a picture frame sometime around December 2009 or January 2010. Maybe by the time they print it out I’ll be able to zip over to the school to pick it up in my flying car and or get my robot maid to pick it up for me.

    In the meantime I do have a copy of my transcript which indicates that I have in fact graduated. I have that attached via kitchen magnet to my refrigerator. I probably would have made copies of it to show employers if any of the college-degree requiring jobs I’d applied to called back for an interview.

Leave a Reply